|
09:15 to 09:45 |
John Ashley (NVIDIA) |
NVIDIA’s roadmap on AI developments |
|
|
|
09:45 to 10:05 |
Vikram Khaire (IIT Tirupati, India) |
Overview of technosignatures |
|
|
|
10:05 to 10:25 |
Luigi Cruz |
SETI Instrumentation |
|
|
|
10:25 to 10:55 |
Vishal Gajjar (University of California, Berkeley, USA) |
Leveraging Fast Transient Pipelines for Technosignature Discovery |
|
|
|
11:30 to 11:50 |
Ujjwal Panda (NCRA, Pune, India) |
Low-frequency study of the hyperactive repeater, FRB 20240114A with the GMRT While most FRBs have been one-off events, a minor fraction (7%) repeats; these are known as repeaters. An even smaller fraction is known as hyperactive repeaters, due to the large number of bursts emitted by them over a short amount of time. Currently, only 5 hyperactive repeaters are known: 20121102A, 20190520B, 20201124A, 20220912A, and 20240114A. In this presentation, we will present the study of 167 bursts detected from FRB 20240114A using the GMRT, over a frequency range of 300 to 750 MHz, and on 4 different dates over a period of 6 months, amounting to more than 18 hours of on-source time. In this presentation, we will talk about our analysis, done using scarab (https://github.com/astrogewgaw/scarab), a new package we developed for the same. The detected bursts showed rich spectro-temporal structure, such as band limitation, drifting sub-bursts, and multiple emission components. The properties of the burst showed a wide variation, with widths varying from ~0.2 to ~40 ms, scattering timescales varying from ~0 to ~30 ms, and DMs varying from ~524 pc cm-3 to ~533 pc cm-3. We see non-Poissonian waiting time distributions for the detected bursts, which indicate that the emission process is not inherently random, and may have some long term memory, as has been previously indicated for other FRBs (e.g.: Wang et al. 2024). We also compare the properties and statistics of the detected bursts from FRB 20240114A to other hyperactive repeaters, which allows us to posit that similar emission mechanisms might be responsible for these events.
|
|
|
|
11:50 to 12:10 |
Arvind Balasubramanian (IIA, Bengaluru, India) |
The nature of the persistent radio source associated with FRB190520B The mechanism of emission of bright radio flashes from Fast Radio Bursts (FRBs) remains an open question to date. From observations, FRBs are of two types - repeaters and one-off events. Some repeaters have been localised to their host galaxy, thereby shedding some light on the possible progenitors. Of these repeaters, FRB121102, FRB190520B and FRB20240114A stand out as the only events for which persistent radio emission associated with the FRBs has been seen. In this talk, I will describe our follow-up observations of the persistent radio source associated with FRB190520B using both the upgraded Giant Metrewave Radio Telescope and the Jansky Very Large Array and present the results in the context of various models that predict the emission and evolution of the persistent source associated with an FRB.
|
|
|
|
12:10 to 12:30 |
Resmi Lekshmi (IIST, Thiruvananthapuram, India) |
Multi-Messenger Gravitational Wave Sources: The Case of Fast Radio Bursts |
|
|
|
12:30 to 12:50 |
Gitika Shukla (IIT Tirupati, India) |
Shadow Imaging of Transiting Systems using Machine Learning |
|
|
|
12:50 to 13:10 |
Liton Majumdar (NISER Bhubaneshwar, India) |
Beyond Biosignatures: The Next Frontier in Detecting Exoplanetary Atmospheric Technosignatures |
|
|
|
14:10 to 14:30 |
Vignesh Vavillakula Venkataramana Rao (National Chung Hsing University, Taiwan) |
Statistical Inference of Fast Radio Burst Environments Using Galaxy Number Density: Similarities Between CHIME Repeaters and Non-Repeaters Fast Radio Bursts (FRBs) are brief yet highly energetic pulses of radio emission, the origin of which remains largely uncertain. FRBs are classified into two categories based on their repetition behavior: repeaters and non-repeaters. Distinct progenitor models have been proposed to account for these differences, with magnetars often associated with repeaters and cataclysmic events with non-repeaters. Therefore, elucidating the differences between these two populations is essential for constraining their underlying origins. However, the difficulty in accurately localizing FRBs has posed a significant challenge in confirming whether their progenitors are indeed distinct. In this study, we estimate the galaxy number density around FRBs listed in the CHIME catalog 1 by utilizing the WISE × PS1 galaxy catalog. Our methodology emphasizes the large-scale galactic environments surrounding FRBs, thereby it is independent of precise localization. This approach enables the inclusion of a significantly larger sample—26 repeaters and 238 non-repeaters—approximately twice the number of currently localized FRBs. If repeaters and non-repeaters originate in distinct galactic environments, it could imply different host and progenitor types. Conversely, similar environments might suggest a common progenitor. Here, we present our findings by comparing the density increments of both repeaters and non-repeater sources. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS) test for the distributions of galaxy number densities around the FRB sources indicates no significant difference between repeaters and non-repeaters with a p-value of 0.405. Our finding suggests that repeaters and non-repeaters could share similar galactic environments and, hence, similar host and progenitor types. In addition to this, we find that the majority of FRBs occur in underdense galactic environments compared to randomly selected regions, exhibiting a mild preference for young stellar populations.
|
|
|
|
14:30 to 14:50 |
Manisha Caleb (University of Sydney, Australia) |
Long Period Transients |
|
|
|
14:50 to 15:10 |
Abhinav Narayan (IIT Indore, India) |
GARUDA powered with TraP: A deep learning based data reduction pipeline for the GMRT to detect LPTs Radio interferometric observations, specially at low frequencies, are often hindered by radio frequency interferences (RFIs), making data processing a time-intensive challenge. With next-generation radio telescopes producing increasingly large datasets, the demand for automated data processing solutions has grown critical. We present GARUDA (Generic AI-based GMRT-tUned Radio Data Analysis pipeline), a novel automated pipeline designed for uGMRT data reduction. Written in Python and utilising modular CASA for calibration, GARUDA includes GNET, our custom Deep Learning based RFI detection model. With only two tunable parameters, GNET ensures flexibility and ease of use across diverse observations and frequency bands. The pipeline handles system issues and performs RFI excision, producing high-quality calibrated data ready for imaging. In this talk, I will present the capabilities of GARUDA, integrated with the LOFAR Transients Pipeline (TraP), for searching Long-Period Transients (LPTs) in GMRT archival data. This dataset spans nearly 20 years and offers adequate time resolution and sensitivity at low radio frequencies -- where LPTs are typically most luminous. We have processed a large set of Galactic plane observations from the GMRT archive and identified several intriguing transient candidates, which will also be highlighted.
|
|
|
|
15:10 to 15:30 |
Yogesh Maan (NCRA, Pune, India) |
Magnetar-FRB connection Fast radio bursts (FRBs) are one of the most intriguing discoveries in the last two decades. Their cosmological distances imply that these short-lived events emit enormous amount of energy, and the exact mechanism and origin of such energy release is still an active topic of research. With huge magnetic energy reservoirs, magnetars are leading candidate sources of FRBs. The first detection of a FRB-like burst from the Galactic magnetar SGR 1935+2154 in April 2020 by CHIME and STARE2, the Galactic FRB 20200428D, provided an irrefutable observational link between FRBs and magnetars. Since then, a few more bright bursts have been detected from SGR 1935+2154 with fluences in excess of 1 kJy ms, including the burst in October 2022 that was detected at two widely separated frequencies with CHIME and GBT. While detection of these bursts strengthen the hypothesis that some of the FRBs originate from magnetars, further observational links between magnetars and FRBs have remained scarce. In this talk, I will present a detailed account of some of the magnetar observations including bursts observed from SGR 1935+2154 in this context, and discuss future approaches that could help in understanding the physical connections between magnetars and FRBs.
|
|
|
|
15:30 to 15:50 |
Yash Eknath Bhusare (NCRA, Pune, India) |
Probing the Local Environments of Repeating FRBs The discovery of persistent radio sources (PRSs) associated with three repeating fast radio bursts (FRBs) has provided crucial insight into the local environments of these enigmatic sources. Here, we present deep radio observations of the fields surrounding four active repeating FRBs—FRB 20220912A, FRB 20240114A, FRB 20240619D and FRB 20230607A —using the upgraded Giant Metrewave Radio Telescope (uGMRT) at low radio frequencies and Karl G. Jansky Very Large Array (VLA) at high frequencies. Towards FRB 20240114A, we report the detection of a compact radio source at 650 MHz with a flux density of 65.6 ± 8.1 μJy/beam. Our spectral index measurements, host galaxy star formation rate, and constraints on the physical size of the source strongly support the interpretation that this is a persistent radio source (PRS) associated with the FRB. We also present preliminary results on the variability of the PRS over a month-long baseline. For FRB 20220912A, while our uGMRT data indicate that the radio emission is likely associated with star formation in the host galaxy, we will also present high-resolution follow-up observations from the VLA across the C, X, Ku, and K bands (5–21 GHz). These reveal a compact radio source at the FRB location nature of which is still unclear. In addition, we will present very recent results from our imaging study of FRB 20230607A, a repeater with an extremely high rotation measure (RM ≈ 12,000 rad/m²), Using uGMRT Band 4 and Band 5. For FRB 20240619D, we place upper limits on radio emission from an associated PRS or from star formation in the host galaxy. The detection of the PRS associated with FRB 20240114A is a valuable addition to the small but growing sample of PRSs associated with FRBs, reinforcing the idea that such sources arise from a magnetoionic medium surrounding the FRB sources.
|
|
|
|
16:20 to 16:40 |
Bhaswati Bhattacharyya (NCRA, Pune, India) |
Fast Transients with the GMRT |
|
|
|
16:40 to 17:00 |
Ankita Ghosh (NCRA, Pune, India) |
Giant Pulses in Pulsars and Millisecond Pulsars: Implications for High-Energy Emission and FRB-like Activity Giant pulses (GPs) are rare, and extremely energetic bursts of radio emission that can exceed the average pulse energy by factors of 100 or more ( Ershov & Kuzmin 2005). These are intrinsically short timescale phenomena, with individual subpulses having durations as brief as 2 ns (Hankins et al. 2003). Such “nanopulses†exhibit brightness temperatures as high as 1037 K. First revealed in the Crab pulsar (Staelin & Reifenstein 1968), GPs have since been identified in both young and millisecond pulsars (MSPs), typically localized to narrow phase windows and coinciding with high-energy X-ray emission, highlighting their likely origin in regions of strong magnetic field near the light cylinder. However, Giant pulses have been studied in detail in only a handful of MSPs (e.g. PSRs B1937+21 (Cognard et al. 1995), B1821−24 (Romani et al. 2001), and J1823−3021A (Knight et al. 2005))-in part because of the fast pulsar period, large dispersive smearing timescale, and relatively weak signal conspires to make single-pulse observations difficult. Interestingly, GPs have also been observed in slow pulsars lacking strong magnetic fields at the light cylinder, such as PSRs J1752+2359, B1112+50, and B0031−07, suggesting multiple physical channels for GP production. These bursts are often phase-stable and can form short temporal clusters, providing clues about magnetospheric processes and emission geometry. The SPOTLIGHT program—a real-time, commensal survey for pulsars and Fast Radio Bursts (FRBs) using the GMRT—has identified 10s of bright single pulses already within a week of deployment, motivating a systematic statistical study of pulse energy, phase localization, and morphology across both MSPs and normal pulsars. Such efforts allow us to examine correlations with intrinsic pulsar properties like magnetic field strength and spin-down luminosity. We aim to conduct a systematic statistical analysis of bright single pulses across a broader sample of normal pulsars as well as MSPs, focusing on energy distributions, pulse-phase localization, morphology, and variability. This will allow us to characterize the emission physics of these pulses and explore correlations with intrinsic pulsar properties such as spin-down luminosity and magnetic field strength. Notably, a moderate anti-correlation between profile stability and magnetic field strength in MSPs hints that stronger magnetic fields may destabilize pulse shapes, potentially enhancing the occurrence of bright pulses (Ghosh et al. 2025, in preparation). These investigations are especially relevant in the context of recent observations of plasma lensing in systems like PSR B1957+20 (Main et al. 2018), where narrowband amplification and temporal clustering of pulses have drawn parallels with the properties of repeating Fast Radio Bursts (FRBs), such as FRB 121102 (Main et al. 2018). Given the similar spectral and temporal behaviors, studying bright pulses from MSPs may offer a valuable window into the emission mechanisms of FRBs and their propagation through dense, dynamic magneto-ionic environments. Through this effort, we aim to bridge the phenomenology of giant pulses in pulsars with that of coherent bursts from other neutron star populations, including magnetars and FRBs
|
|
|
|
17:00 to 17:40 |
- |
Discussions on Future follow-up strategies |
|
|